3 ms·
Although I'm a bit scared of the advertisement industry, I'm hopeful this can turn out to be good. Most product placement are very subtle and non-intrusive, so
by marcodiego 5y ago
Although I'm a bit scared of the advertisement industry, I'm hopeful this can turn out to be good. Most product placement are very subtle and non-intrusive, so they don't bother me too much. It may eventually lower the price of streaming services because it is a new revenue stream and may possibly enable a service were costumers don't have to pay for, like old non-cable TV but without intervals.
Also, this creates incentives for preservation and re-launch of classic films.
Ideally this could trigger a flow where producers create content; post-producers gather resources from advertisers pay the producers, digitally place products and distribute to consumers. If every step is healthy, it can even get to the viewers without the need to pay for it.
This could be a boom for entertainment in poorer countries where a good deal of the population can't pay for streaming. Some people simply wouldn't mind watching a five year old blockbuster with product placements if they don't have to pay for it.
Of course, it is possible that I'm being optimistic here... we'll have to see how this turns out.
- robbyking 5y agoI sometimes prefer subtle product placement. It looks weird when a character asks for a "beer" at a bar or a "pack of cigarettes" at a bodega. It would feel much more natural they just asked for a pack of Camels.
- the_local_host 5y agoI'd prefer blatant product placement, e.g. Kermit the Frog emerges from Greedo's corpse in the "Han Shoots First" version of "Star Wars", looks directly at the camera, and tries to sell the audience cigarettes.