3 ms·
> Also, it sounds unreasonable to tell a company whose principal product produces CO2 to stop making it. It's not saying that. The primary thing the court orde
by daenney 5y ago
> Also, it sounds unreasonable to tell a company whose principal product produces CO2 to stop making it.
It's not saying that. The primary thing the court order does is move up the timeline from Shell's own stated goal of reducing CO2 emissions by 45% by 2035. It moves the deadline to 2030 and makes it legally binding instead of pinky-swear.