3 ms·

"There's very often a speed / memory usage tradeoff." And yet Firefox seems to use about 4 or 5 times more memory than Chrome on my system whilst being noticab

"There's very often a speed / memory usage tradeoff." And yet Firefox seems to use about 4 or 5 times more memory than Chrome on my system whilst being noticably slower as well... If Chrome had all the addons that Firefox had, Firefox would be a dead browser. I still use Firefox as my primary browser. For now.

itsnotvalid 15y ago
I have the inverse of your situation that chrome always use much more memory than firefox.
william42 15y ago
That's because 1) Chrome is better-designed 2) Chrome extensions are JS and not native code, meaning they're less likely to leak due to programmer error, and there are fewer of them, to boot
- lmz 15y ago
  > 2) Chrome extensions are JS and not native code, meaning they're less likely to leak due to programmer error, and there are fewer of them, to boot Are there really that many Firefox extensions that use native code?
- udoprog 15y ago
  Side note: Firefox extensions aren't native code, they're written in JS. EDIT: I do however agree that chrome is more well designed. Firefox has been through a lot of iterations through the years.
  - mnutt 15y ago
    While most Firefox extensions are in JS, I believe you can bind to native c++ as well.
    - lmz 15y ago
      Chrome also allows you to access native code in extensions using NPAPI plugins: http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/npapi.html http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/npapi.html