3 ms·

Its not relevant to look at lockdown countries like Portugal and examine temporary ICU statistics, because it is too difficult to tease out the impacts of COVID

Its not relevant to look at lockdown countries like Portugal and examine temporary ICU statistics, because it is too difficult to tease out the impacts of COVID vs the impact of lockdown. The point is - were lockdowns actually useful, or was it all just theatre? Given that Sweden and Ukraine have lower COVID deaths per capita than lockdown countries, it would suggest that lockdown worsened the situation: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1104709/coronavirus-deaths-worldwide-per-million-inhabitants/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/1104709/coronavirus-deat... Portugal pursued measures like limiting opening hours which seem to have no purpose apart from concentrating people into stores at the same time.

Angostura 5y ago
> and examine temporary ICU statistics, because it is too difficult to tease out the impacts of COVID vs the impact of lockdown. It's actually quite easy. If you look at the outbreak in the UK that started in November, you can see cases and hospital admissions rising rapidly before lockdown is imposed. Then in February, you can see cases falling rapidly while lockdown is still imposed. The cases and hospitalisations are related to Covid - they don't map well onto lockdown. In fact excess deaths became negative for a while a the end of the spike, with lockdown still in effect.
iso1631 5y ago
Deaths per million of Sweden and it's surrounding countries, from your page: Sweden 1,399.65 Denmark 431.21 Finland 170.64 Norway 146.23 > Given that Sweden and Ukraine have lower COVID deaths per capita than lockdown countries That's simply wrong, by your own data.