I could make a laundry list of features (for example: not being forced into a linear order of includes (or at least having idempotent "include"s), no namespace

I could make a laundry list of features (for example: not being forced into a linear order of includes (or at least having idempotent "include"s), no namespace collision for test files, not having to list all the tests in "runtests.jl",[1] support for pending tests, support for parameterised tests, proper assertion libraries with more useful error output, etc. pp.), but I also feel like Julia developers could just look at any of the other major general purpose languages, almost all of which have better module systems and testing frameworks because these are things that matter to application developers. [1]: I actually tried to automate some of this in a project: https://gitlab.com/pfrasa/morcrypto/-/blob/master/test/runtests.jl https://gitlab.com/pfrasa/morcrypto/-/blob/master/test/runte...