3 ms·
It’s still significant because it’s a huge anomaly to the annual mean difference between the two populations.
by User23 5y ago
It’s still significant because it’s a huge anomaly to the annual mean difference between the two populations.
- unpolloloco 5y agoAbsolutely. But the paper is talking about a long-term mortality divergence between populations, not a peak in 2017 like you were claiming (and there's nothing about 2020 data in this paper).