3 ms·
The author is refering to the "National Misery", which is not "National", is global, is affecting all of us.
by kuu 5y ago
The author is refering to the "National Misery", which is not "National", is global, is affecting all of us.
- gspr 5y agoThere is a pandemic. It is a global misery. Part of this pandemic is happening in country X. In country X it is also a national misery. Declaring something a national misery does not preclude it from also being a global one.
- kuu 5y agoThe thing is that is called pandemic because a reason: the virus is still mutating, and I don't know how possible it is and it's up to discussion, but a mutation is possible and your nation (which by the way still has many cases) can be reinfected again. To think that "my nation has less cases, all is over now for us" is to don't understand what pandemic means.
- gspr 5y agoPure speculation. Sure, the misery may come back. But for the US, UK, Israel, Australia, New Zealand and soon a bunch of European countries, the pandemic will soon be over. It is not over elsewhere, and it may come back to the aforementioned places. That doesn't mean one can't rejoyce that the misery is over (whether it's for now or for good).
- thatguy0900 5y agoI mean, it's both. It is a national misery and a global misery. The national misery is almost over. The global probably isn't.