2 ms·
I'd choose the separate infrastructure. We already spend billions on highways every year (often new highways which will end up being liabilities down the road a
by noobermin 5y ago
I'd choose the separate infrastructure. We already spend billions on highways every year (often new highways which will end up being liabilities down the road as opposed to maintenance) we can spend a little on better infra. I'd rather not treat the situation as zero sum and basically wish more drivers and car riders die in larger numbers.
Again the situation isn't zero sum, we can save both car rider lives and bike rider and pedestrian lives.
- sokoloff 5y agoIn terms of space requirements, the situation is zero-sum in many places (or pretty close to it). The buildings in a city (or other established area) are a set distance apart. What’s the split of what’s between them is what you’re deciding on and that often involves non-monetary tradeoffs.