3 ms·
There's the (controversial) concept of "Risk Compensation", which covers some of the same ground; when we feel safer driving (eg, when we start wearing a seatbe
by ranko 5y ago
There's the (controversial) concept of "Risk Compensation", which covers some of the same ground; when we feel safer driving (eg, when we start wearing a seatbelt), we unconsciously compensate by driving with slightly less care. There are two problems with this: the risk is often transferred to other people, and the magnitude of the compensation is not guaranteed to be the same.
The Netherlands is a great example of reworking the streets to make them better (see for example: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/may/05/amsterdam-bicycle-capital-world-transport-cycling-kindermoord https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/may/05/amsterdam-bic... and https://bicycledutch.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/how-the-dutch-got-their-cycling-infrastructure/ https://bicycledutch.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/how-the-dutch-...). There was a large and well-organised campaign starting in the 1970s.
- jb1991 5y agoStill lots of problems... Netherlands is second worst in Europe for bike fatalities: https://www.iamexpat.nl/lifestyle/lifestyle-news/netherlands-second-place-cyclist-deaths-europe https://www.iamexpat.nl/lifestyle/lifestyle-news/netherlands...
- Xylakant 5y agoThe article you quote contradicts your assertion: > Despite this, the Netherlands is defended in the report. As cycling is a lot more common in the Netherlands compared to other countries, it stands to reason that more cycling fatalities occur. According to the report, the Netherlands is one of the safest places to cycle, with extensive cycling infrastructure networks.