3 ms·
> 1. Just like Asians have been the "model minority," Blacks are treated as the opposite. There's a lot of resentment going one way, and a lot of "what did you
by sol_invictus 5y ago
> 1. Just like Asians have been the "model minority," Blacks are treated as the opposite. There's a lot of resentment going one way, and a lot of "what did you hit me for?" going the other way.
Not sure I'm understanding; are you saying asians are targeted by blacks because of some "race retaliation" scheme?
> 4. There's a fair bit of talk these days in some of my circles that there's a divide-and-conquer thing going on.
Divide-and-conquer of what exactly?
- ergocoder 5y ago"model minority" is a narrative that may be true or false. Maybe they are taught. I have no idea. But there are several cases where black attacked Asians unprovoked. Like what else was the reason for an attack?? Another reason is that blacks aren't arrested or prosecuted when attacking Asians. There are a few examples where SF tried hard to downplay (and/or not prosecute at all) black-on-asian crime. For example, you can search for the news reporter Dion Lim where she found that a black-on-asian case is dropped silently.
- bingbong70 5y agoWestern monopoly capital is aware that Afro-Asian unity is a potential economic threat. Dividing these communities is a priority to some... The narratives will be mainstreamed, any problems will be amplified, and I have a feeling covert elements have/will fund the conflict. This also potentially results in the side effect of Asians (specifically Chinese) fleeing the country and/or siding with the majority against African liberation and civil rights issues. This is seen as a win-win scenario. Anyone that's closely studied colonial history intuitively understands what might be going on and recognizes the pattern. The structures capable of this kind of sabotage (that historically operated in Asia, Africa and South/Central America) didn't die off, they just became dormant/less-active temporarily.