3 ms·
> Well if assumption is gaza itself is military threat basically there are no innocent people or buildings there, so no evidence will suffice. I don't think th
by rat87 5y ago
> Well if assumption is gaza itself is military threat basically there are no innocent people or buildings there, so no evidence will suffice.
I don't think that Israel is claiming that, although some
people might make such a stupid claim.
>It is extremely hard to believe that at least by accident that Israel has not bombed civilian target, harder still to believe that all the "Intel" they have is so accurate that they know exactly always which civilian buildings Hamas operates out of during the middle of a war.
That seems sadly quite possible and hard to verify either way. Also my guess would be that most of the intel was gathered prior to the war.
- manquer 5y agoPrecisely because most of the Intel was gathered before the war it could be inaccurate don't you think ? Is it not likely any quasi military organization would move things around once war actually starts ?