3 ms·

> It's the same reason Israel claims that every building they level in Gaza is a military target. Want to cite that counterclaim? Which innocent building was r

> It's the same reason Israel claims that every building they level in Gaza is a military target. Want to cite that counterclaim? Which innocent building was razed?

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
jrochkind1 5y ago
> It's the same reason cops in the US cite noncompliance as a justification for violence. how about that one? Which person that doesn't deserve it has ever been the victim of police violence? Can you prove it?
- jasonwatkinspdx 5y ago
  Imagine posting this on the anniversary of George Floyd's death.
- anders_p 5y ago
  Jesus Christ you can't be serious? Have never heard about what happened during the Civil Rights movement? Try a web search for police violence. You will see hours upon hours of unprovoked violence by the US police. Your comment is quite frankly incredibly ignorant.
  - 8note 5y ago
    I think there might have been a whoosh here, considering this was a reply to the "all buildings in Gaza are terrorists" comment.
    - jrochkind1 5y ago
      Yup. Equally offensive and ignorant. Why does one get this (justified if you thought I meant it) response but not the other? For asking for "proof of innocence" of people murdered by state violence.
manquer 5y ago
Well if assumption is gaza itself is military threat basically there are no innocent people or buildings there, so no evidence will suffice. It is extremely hard to believe that at least by accident that Israel has not bombed civilian target, harder still to believe that all the "Intel" they have is so accurate that they know exactly always which civilian buildings Hamas operates out of during the middle of a war. Extraordinary claims that not a single civilian target was bombed needs extraordinary proof .
- rat87 5y ago
  > Well if assumption is gaza itself is military threat basically there are no innocent people or buildings there, so no evidence will suffice. I don't think that Israel is claiming that, although some people might make such a stupid claim. >It is extremely hard to believe that at least by accident that Israel has not bombed civilian target, harder still to believe that all the "Intel" they have is so accurate that they know exactly always which civilian buildings Hamas operates out of during the middle of a war. That seems sadly quite possible and hard to verify either way. Also my guess would be that most of the intel was gathered prior to the war.
  - manquer 5y ago
    Precisely because most of the Intel was gathered before the war it could be inaccurate don't you think ? Is it not likely any quasi military organization would move things around once war actually starts ?

> It's the same reason Israel claims that every building they level in Gaza is a military target. Want to cite that counterclaim? Which innocent building was razed?

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]

jrochkind1 5y ago

> It's the same reason cops in the US cite noncompliance as a justification for violence. how about that one? Which person that doesn't deserve it has ever been the victim of police violence? Can you prove it?

jasonwatkinspdx 5y ago
Imagine posting this on the anniversary of George Floyd's death.
anders_p 5y ago
Jesus Christ you can't be serious? Have never heard about what happened during the Civil Rights movement? Try a web search for police violence. You will see hours upon hours of unprovoked violence by the US police. Your comment is quite frankly incredibly ignorant.
- 8note 5y ago
  I think there might have been a whoosh here, considering this was a reply to the "all buildings in Gaza are terrorists" comment.
  - jrochkind1 5y ago
    Yup. Equally offensive and ignorant. Why does one get this (justified if you thought I meant it) response but not the other? For asking for "proof of innocence" of people murdered by state violence.

manquer 5y ago

Well if assumption is gaza itself is military threat basically there are no innocent people or buildings there, so no evidence will suffice. It is extremely hard to believe that at least by accident that Israel has not bombed civilian target, harder still to believe that all the "Intel" they have is so accurate that they know exactly always which civilian buildings Hamas operates out of during the middle of a war. Extraordinary claims that not a single civilian target was bombed needs extraordinary proof .

rat87 5y ago
> Well if assumption is gaza itself is military threat basically there are no innocent people or buildings there, so no evidence will suffice. I don't think that Israel is claiming that, although some people might make such a stupid claim. >It is extremely hard to believe that at least by accident that Israel has not bombed civilian target, harder still to believe that all the "Intel" they have is so accurate that they know exactly always which civilian buildings Hamas operates out of during the middle of a war. That seems sadly quite possible and hard to verify either way. Also my guess would be that most of the intel was gathered prior to the war.
- manquer 5y ago
  Precisely because most of the Intel was gathered before the war it could be inaccurate don't you think ? Is it not likely any quasi military organization would move things around once war actually starts ?