7 ms·

Here are some lispers' impressions: https://gist.github.com/vindarel/c1ef5e043773921e3b11d8f4fe1ca7ac https://gist.github.com/vindarel/c1ef5e043773921e3b11d8f4f

Here are some lispers' impressions: https://gist.github.com/vindarel/c1ef5e043773921e3b11d8f4fe1ca7ac https://gist.github.com/vindarel/c1ef5e043773921e3b11d8f4fe1... Racket seems to miss at least two big points: the interactivity/the debugger and the condition system.

fiddlerwoaroof 5y ago
Yeah, the Racket/Scheme mindset is generally very different from the mindset of most CL users I’ve come across: despite the superficial similarities, scheme users seem to be less interested in interactive “repl-driven” workflows than most CLers