At risk of throwing a sub thread of chaos, this was what I found interesting in these comments. Specifically regarding the current Sheikh Jarrah conflict. Who

At risk of throwing a sub thread of chaos, this was what I found interesting in these comments. Specifically regarding the current Sheikh Jarrah conflict. Who actually 'owns' the land, and what does that mean? It seems like it completely depends on what time frame you look at and what claims the winner of war has or can enforce with force. In the US, what about the Native Nations and the canceling or flat out ignoring of past legal documents. or the land given to former slaves later taken away. Personally I lean towards your opinions. if the ruling power won't act humanely then reparations/compensation seems like the 2nd best option.