3 ms·
> Hangouts _is_ Meet and Allo, if it weren't for the constant migration notices leading to constant commentary no one would be the wiser, So, let's say that's
by CarelessExpert 5y ago
> Hangouts _is_ Meet and Allo, if it weren't for the constant migration notices leading to constant commentary no one would be the wiser,
So, let's say that's true (and bluntly, after the Hangouts EOL notice I just jumped ship entirely to Signal as, frankly, I couldn't be bothered to figure out what the heck Google was doing), and that Allo and Meet--which are marketed as two different products--are somehow seamlessly integrated with the rest of the Google ecosystem so that you didn't actually need to grok the differences.
Assuming that was true, Google still completely botched the communication, and believe it or not, marketing and communication are really damn important. Google could have the greatest technology ever, but they're perceived as being unreliable, and both their words and their actions reinforce that perception.
So, maybe in this specific example, the transition wasn't as traumatic is the flat out cancellation of Reader or Plus. But in the end, the communication was so muddled that it ultimately doesn't matter because to the rest of the world outside the Google bubble it just looks like yet another example of Google being Google.
- sdenton4 5y ago'...perceived as being unreliable...' AFAICT, the primary effect is that HN commentary on any google release has approximately zero SNR. Some back-room team could cure cancer and the HN thread would be 90% complaints about Reader. Compare/contrast the vast numbers of dead github projects, dead startups, and dead code generally. (Also, who the fsck calls the cancellation of plus traumatic?? That's comedy gold.) This is an open source release under the MIT license. You can use it, fork it, or ignore it...