3 ms·
As someone with the misfortune to work in a large enterprise, this doesn't make sense - corporate are very sensitive to data leaving their network. As just one
by GordonS 5y ago
As someone with the misfortune to work in a large enterprise, this doesn't make sense - corporate are very sensitive to data leaving their network. As just one example, the place where I work very rarely let's us use anything cloud-hosted (Slack is just one example). And when the do, it's a years long process to get it.
I haven't looked into how this works, but if it's sending keystrokes or command lines to the cloud (one of the founders is here, please do correct me if I'm wrong!), it has no chance of being used in your average corporate environment.
- cwdegidio 5y agoExactly. Having data leave our network (major corp environment) is a huge issue. Even when we are working with vendors, data comes in, but rarely, and only with many levels of authorization does it ever leave. Any tool that is sending any information to the cloud is DOA for our org.
- GordonS 5y agoI want to add something a bit more positive - if you come with an on-prem version, it will have much more of a chance to sell within the enterprise. Of course, that's a lot more hassle to support etc.
- qshaman 5y ago^this. At least at FAANG , you will get flagged by opsec using a tool like this. Also, I don't think engineers here need something like this to be productive, nor having the same email domain means they use the same tools, but maybe is just me, as other people said, there are other tools that provide autocompletion, offline and free(as in speech). But maybe if you get PG to say this product will be the future of development, people will buy into it. I truly wish the founders the best of luck.