3 ms·
Brazil. Without trial or hard evidence, you're not supposed to associate people of being that criminal persona. That'd be vexatious litigation and libel (or sla
by rufibarbatus 15y ago
Brazil. Without trial or hard evidence, you're not supposed to associate people of being that criminal persona. That'd be vexatious litigation and libel (or slander, or defamation — English is not my first language, I'm not sure which word is the appropriate one here).
But don't read it like me pointing at you and saying "in Brazil you'd get your arse fined for that!" Read it as: I was taught to believe that what you just did is very serious and so I'm trying to see the relevance of your comment.
If you think you have hard evidence that you know who commited a fellony, go tip the police. I wouldn't in good faith want to attach that much stigma to someone's name in a public forum when there's a risk, a real chance I might be wrong.
- rpearl 15y agoVery well, I have updated my post to clarify the people who originally made the claim.
- ljf 15y agoYou've still left it up - in the UK that would be slanderous - and I do not feel this is the place for such gossip and name calling. If that is his correct details - fine, but if not you are messing with someone's life and I don't really understand why you are doing that? If you went out and tracked this guy down, fair enough, but you are just repeating gossip. Can you let me know what you planned to achieve with this?