3 ms·
It's certainly a sign of closed mindedness. AFAICT most discussion on the internet is pretty closed-minded though, people have their preconceptions, and they a
by Nursie 5y ago
It's certainly a sign of closed mindedness.
AFAICT most discussion on the internet is pretty closed-minded though, people have their preconceptions, and they argue them. Rarely is anyone enlightened, or are minds changed. It is common to see such a person be corrected on a point of fact but then go on to repeat the same falsehood in another place or on another day. This is likely because to them the narrative is important, the emotions, rather than correctness.
> Correcting someone in a public venue isn't for the audience of one that is spouting stupid things, it's for the rest of the world that is reading the thread.
I hope so, but I'm not sure it works like that either, as the legions of spouters seem to grow by the day :/
- Nasrudith 5y agoI suspect "spam filter heuristics" also contribute to close mindedness. If something is repeated ad nauseam and the observer finds it false every time then they mentally downgrade the reliability to "known bullshit, not worth listening to". The process is agnostic to any objective truth and could apply to stubborn flat-earthers taking "against intuition and the ability to easily comprehend like a flat map" as false.