3 ms·
You could try to look on in from another perspective. The library is free and worked on by maintainers in a spare time from main duties (not talking here about
by achempion 5y ago
You could try to look on in from another perspective.
The library is free and worked on by maintainers in a spare time from main duties (not talking here about lodash specifically).
Maintainers don't own you any support nor obliged to work the way you may think they should.
I would say that it's great that we have many tools and should give more respect to maintainers which basically save you a ton of resources and maximum they ask for is to follow the established processes.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- NetOpWibby 5y agoYou haven’t addressed the hostile attitude of the maintainer, which was the point.
- a1369209993 5y agoThe hostile and deceptive attitude of the maintainer. If they honestly admitted that they didn't give a crap about bug reports, or even just didn't bother setting up any system for recieving them, that would disappointing, but achempion's comment would cover the situation nicely. The problem (assuming the previously stated facts are accurate) is they actively set up a system to solicit and recieve bug reports, and then systematically sabotaged and neglected that system when people tried to actually report bugs.
- hinkley 5y agoI feel like we could have the same conversation about the Docker folks and so this feels more like a popularity contest than an objective conversation.
- CRConrad 5y agoIt's not as if "Person or group B are also objectively arseholes!" logically invalidates "Person or group A are objectively arseholes", is it?