4 ms·
We have held people (including Uyghurs) in Guantanamo bay without trials or being charged for up to and over 18 years. https://www.npr.org/2020/09/30/918454831
by 1cvmask 5y ago
We have held people (including Uyghurs) in Guantanamo bay without trials or being charged for up to and over 18 years.
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/30/918454831/trial-of-sept-11-defendants-at-guant-namo-delayed-until-august-2021 https://www.npr.org/2020/09/30/918454831/trial-of-sept-11-de...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/31/uighur-men-leave-guantanamo-bay-slovakia https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/31/uighur-men-lea...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uyghur_detainees_at_Guantanamo_Bay https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uyghur_detainees_at_Guantanamo...
- throwaway292893 5y agoBecause they were terrorists, we didn't hold 3 million of them in gitmo simply because they were ethnic minorities. Orders of magnitudes in difference. Holding a few dozen suspected terrorists !== holding 3 million people (nearly an entire race) You can justify there may be proof for those few alleged jihads. You cannot reasonably prove those 3 million people are all terrorists. Where are the cries to shut down these camps like there were cries to shut down Gitmo?
- 1cvmask 5y agoThey were alleged terrorists. They were released after they were found to not be terrorists. Otherwise they would still be in captivity I suppose.
- boomboomsubban 5y agoChina's justification for holding Uyghurs is that they are terrorists, with a similar amount of evidence provided as for Guantanamo detainees.
- MagnumOpus 5y agoOrders of magnitude. While both strain credulity, it is more plausible to take a government at its word for 300 people than for 3 million. Plausibly it could be the case that there are 100 wrongly imprisoned people in Camp X-Ray without legal recourse... But equally plausibly there are at the very least 1,000,000 wrongly imprisoned people in the Uyghurstan concentration camps, with thousands added every day...
- atatatat 5y agoA good chunk of Twitter et al. Where are you?