3 ms·
Oh I think you're right but what was maybe half quality a few years ago is now a small fraction of HD signal quality. Perhaps x% of median quality of Canadian
by a3camero 15y ago
Oh I think you're right but what was maybe half quality a few years ago is now a small fraction of HD signal quality.
Perhaps x% of median quality of Canadian broadcast channel signal quality would be more appropriate? I'm not sure but fixing at 320x240 seems like probably not the best approach.
- soundslikeneon 15y agoI don't think it matters that the median broadcast quality is getting better. 320x240 @ 15 fps was deemed high enough quality for the kind of reference/archive work that media monitors are doing. It's big enough that you can see what's going on and small enough to discourage watching these copies for entertainment. That number doesn't really need to change unless our eyes are collectively getting worse.