3 ms·
I get the impression that your solution: - is adjacent to using static site generators with a custom template - is right "below" (in the abstraction tree)
by 97-109-107 5y ago
I get the impression that your solution:
- is adjacent to using static site generators with a custom template
- is right "below" (in the abstraction tree) a headless CMS approach, where you manage multiple landing pages from a central place
Currently the way you're positioning this, the distance to either approaches is too close for me to clearly see an advantage. However, it only comes down to personal preferences.
Or to put in a different perspective - the advantage of this being simple "loses out" to potential advantages of other approaches and might need something more to stand out.
- traviskaufman 5y agoThat feedback paints a really clear picture in my head as to how you see us falling into the larger ecosystem; thank you! I'd love to get more clarity into the "advantages" of each type of solution you mentioned above. When would you use a headless CMS vs. a static site generator with a custom template?
- 97-109-107 5y agoI would't say that any of these approaches have inherit advantages, the broader use case context would dictate which approach is more practical long-term.