> for the scientific community to self-govern how their work is assessed and rewarded. Doesn't this already happen? Science chose bibliometrics as its God. Mak

> for the scientific community to self-govern how their work is assessed and rewarded. Doesn't this already happen? Science chose bibliometrics as its God. Making a new God out of crypto and crowdsourcing doesn't feel like it addresses the root concern, which is human bias in the scientific method. It sounds like the system you're divising is just a new way for humans to bungle things with bias (no offense intended). I think you're on to something with trying to develop a new method, but perhaps we should figure out how to remove the bias before involving money and human heuristics?