3 ms·
Not that that would help anyway. That's becoming increasingly an appeal to authority. There isn't anybody to do the review that isn't a colleague or a competito
by neilwilson 5y ago
Not that that would help anyway. That's becoming increasingly an appeal to authority. There isn't anybody to do the review that isn't a colleague or a competitor, or worse part of an established GroupThink.
Peer review has had its day due to specialisation in science. The gold standard now has to be replication from the published method.
Therefore: not replicated.
- okaram 5y agoPeer reviewed is not the gold standard, it is the bare minimum for lay people to start paying attention.
- neilwilson 5y agoIt's an appeal to authority. Authority which is not established but the process. Increasingly it adds nothing.