3 ms·
This case depicts the global profit-pandemic. Profit before all, profit before people. People share the cost, companies share the profit. This model will break
by csbartus 5y ago
This case depicts the global profit-pandemic. Profit before all, profit before people. People share the cost, companies share the profit.
This model will break. A treshold is reached, scientists revolt.
A similar case, recently, in Europe popped up in football / soccer. Supporters and players defy the creation of a Superleague focused on higher profits for a select few.
Profit-seeking eats the world. A healthy regulation is needed. People first, profit next would be a sustainable trade-off.
- dannyw 5y agoWithout wanting to get too political, the only reason publishers have the current model is because our legal system grants it as such with copyright. I wouldn't be surprised if abolishing copyright meant a more vibrant music and film industry; with more indie producers and less mega labels and producers.
- Rochus 5y ago> because our legal system grants it as such with copyright First and formost because scientists are forced by contract to transfer their IP right of the publication to the publishing company if they want to publish there. > if abolishing copyright meant a more vibrant music and film industry Copyright as such was originally a good idea and was intended to provide authors with an income. But it has been corrupted over time like so many things (e.g. patent law) so that today the artists and authors benefit the least. Big publishing companies and collecting societies profit the most. So it's not copyright that needs to be abolished, but the opportunities for abuse.