4 ms·

I must say that as someone who is a very occasional user of vector drawing tools (and mainly uses them for prepping SVG for web) I’m sufficiently impressed by t

I must say that as someone who is a very occasional user of vector drawing tools (and mainly uses them for prepping SVG for web) I’m sufficiently impressed by the latest version of Affinity Designer as an Illustrator replacement. I was able to open an .ai file, modify it, and export an .svg which was a perfect drop-in replacement for an .svg previously exported by Illustrator. It’s still too expensive for me at full price but I nabbed a Mac App Store license when it was on sale a few weeks ago. I haven’t tried Inkscape recently, but last time I did it failed horribly at the most basic tasks of path editing and SVG prep.

wlesieutre 5y ago
At $25 on sale (which it currently is), a permanent license for Affinity Designer is cheaper than one month of Adobe Illustrator. Adobe likes to advertise it as $20.99/month, but that's only with a 12 month commitment, and you can't cancel early without paying. Renting Illustrator for a single month will really cost you $31.41. Even at full price ($50), Affinity Designer costs less than two months of Illustrator. Not a professional artist and don't use it often, but it's enough of a value that hobbyists like me can actually use it. Any of Adobe's products, not so much.
jdhendrickson 5y ago
I bought all of their products the minute I found out they were still pursuing that oh so old fashioned idea of allowing you to OWN the software you buy from them.
- stevenicr 5y ago
  same reason I just bought my 8th(?) copy of photoimpact first one around 2005(?). (two of those for other people's machines so they can use it without worrying about license failures or/and recurring billing) I don't mind paying for a new license for each new box I want to use it on - because it still works on my xp machine, and each other one - with or without internet connectivity - no license check needed- it just works.
girvo 5y ago
Affinity Photo and Designer are brilliant. I'd second their recommendation. Also, the Apple Photos integration for Affinity Photo is pretty damned handy :)
- sprkwd 5y ago
  Moved over to affinity a while back and the only thing I miss is line trace from illustrator. Bunch of great little products.
  - jiveturkey 5y ago
    use inkscape for that! i find affinity to be lacking but very very good value for money. so no complaints
yeko 5y ago
> I was able to open a .ai file, Actually it doesn't, Affinity open the embbded pdf in Ai file, some metadata like textframe/alignment does not exist in pdf.
- simondotau 5y ago
  Good to know, this probably explained why the notionally transparent artwork was imported with a white background. But the fact that it’s not a true .ai import I don't think this is ever going to be a concern to me because I never use SVG to typeset flowing blocks of text. The main things I'm concerned about are: 1) Path and style integrity 2) Artboard dimensional integrity 3) Export file quality In my testing, I was able to open a file I had edited and saved in Illustrator, export it as an SVG, it was an utterly pixel-perfect drop-in replacement for a previously exported SVG. I was also able to confirm that all of the SVG files I care about can be opened directly, edited and exported with no errors. That's enough for me to confidently say goodbye to Illustrator forever. It's robust enough that I know I can deal with the occasional import glitch if it ever does happen.
  - fractallyte 5y ago
    There are some really annoying things about Designer, though - like how it insists on rasterizing Gaussian blurs, even though SVG supports them as a vector operation...
  - jiveturkey 5y ago
    affinity artboard support is newish, and not great. you may want to deep dive into it to be sure their implementation is good for you
    - simondotau 5y ago
      Yes, I did. My files are simple. Around 15 or so assets. One file per asset, no elaborate effects used.
toastal 5y ago
Not commenting on Affinity's quality, but being closed-sourced and Linux support will (and probably should) turn off a lot of the HN community.
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]

wlesieutre 5y ago

At $25 on sale (which it currently is), a permanent license for Affinity Designer is cheaper than one month of Adobe Illustrator. Adobe likes to advertise it as $20.99/month, but that's only with a 12 month commitment, and you can't cancel early without paying. Renting Illustrator for a single month will really cost you $31.41. Even at full price ($50), Affinity Designer costs less than two months of Illustrator. Not a professional artist and don't use it often, but it's enough of a value that hobbyists like me can actually use it. Any of Adobe's products, not so much.

jdhendrickson 5y ago

I bought all of their products the minute I found out they were still pursuing that oh so old fashioned idea of allowing you to OWN the software you buy from them.

stevenicr 5y ago
same reason I just bought my 8th(?) copy of photoimpact first one around 2005(?). (two of those for other people's machines so they can use it without worrying about license failures or/and recurring billing) I don't mind paying for a new license for each new box I want to use it on - because it still works on my xp machine, and each other one - with or without internet connectivity - no license check needed- it just works.

girvo 5y ago

Affinity Photo and Designer are brilliant. I'd second their recommendation. Also, the Apple Photos integration for Affinity Photo is pretty damned handy :)

sprkwd 5y ago
Moved over to affinity a while back and the only thing I miss is line trace from illustrator. Bunch of great little products.
- jiveturkey 5y ago
  use inkscape for that! i find affinity to be lacking but very very good value for money. so no complaints

yeko 5y ago

> I was able to open a .ai file, Actually it doesn't, Affinity open the embbded pdf in Ai file, some metadata like textframe/alignment does not exist in pdf.

simondotau 5y ago
Good to know, this probably explained why the notionally transparent artwork was imported with a white background. But the fact that it’s not a true .ai import I don't think this is ever going to be a concern to me because I never use SVG to typeset flowing blocks of text. The main things I'm concerned about are: 1) Path and style integrity 2) Artboard dimensional integrity 3) Export file quality In my testing, I was able to open a file I had edited and saved in Illustrator, export it as an SVG, it was an utterly pixel-perfect drop-in replacement for a previously exported SVG. I was also able to confirm that all of the SVG files I care about can be opened directly, edited and exported with no errors. That's enough for me to confidently say goodbye to Illustrator forever. It's robust enough that I know I can deal with the occasional import glitch if it ever does happen.
- fractallyte 5y ago
  There are some really annoying things about Designer, though - like how it insists on rasterizing Gaussian blurs, even though SVG supports them as a vector operation...
- jiveturkey 5y ago
  affinity artboard support is newish, and not great. you may want to deep dive into it to be sure their implementation is good for you
  - simondotau 5y ago
    Yes, I did. My files are simple. Around 15 or so assets. One file per asset, no elaborate effects used.

toastal 5y ago

Not commenting on Affinity's quality, but being closed-sourced and Linux support will (and probably should) turn off a lot of the HN community.

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]