> Unicode exists and is well supported, not using someone’s actual name when it’s entirely feasible is just rude. It's really not, and I say this as someone wh

> Unicode exists and is well supported, not using someone’s actual name when it’s entirely feasible is just rude. It's really not, and I say this as someone whose "actual name" has to be transliterated for an ASCII representation. It hardly ever makes sense to put in the work to convert old systems to accept unicode names, nobody actually cares. Every single government transliterates their citizens names on their passports.