It's a default judgment, so it doesn't mean much. It does seem like Tesla realized that the current fast charging + 100% utilization was going to be negative t

It's a default judgment, so it doesn't mean much. It does seem like Tesla realized that the current fast charging + 100% utilization was going to be negative to customer experience quickly (battery degradation) and adapted their charging speed+spare, but they provided no information or guidance to users. This sounds the same as the Apple situation. In both cases, simply providing appropriate information for users would likely have resolved the whole issue. But they did it quietly and let it be a surprise.