2 ms·
Both excellent points. > "hello" more than suffices (nothing is also perfectly acceptable). To me -- as a receiver -- it feels impersonal to get a barked resp
by modernerd 15y ago
Both excellent points.
> "hello" more than suffices (nothing is also perfectly acceptable).
To me -- as a receiver -- it feels impersonal to get a barked response without a greeting, especially if I'm writing to a company or in a professional context, and particularly if their answer seems canned. And, as a sender, it feels uncomfortable starting without a short personal greeting (at least for the first email you send). In the field of customer service, especially, you need to convey that you've acknowledged the sender's unique concerns. Even when they're far from unique.
Some interesting reading here in "Are greetings and salutations redundant in an e-mail?": http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/18396/are-greetings-and-salutations-redundant-in-an-e-mail http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/18396/are-greetin...
In case it ever crops up, addressing Her Majesty The Queen in written form as 'Madam' and closing with 'I have the honour to be, Madam, Your Majesty's humble and obedient servant' is just fine.
- bostonvaulter2 15y agoAdding my name isn't enough to make automated replies sound personal.
- masklinn 15y agoExactly. If it's an automated reply it's going to sound impersonal either way, and if it's not an automated reply... don't hire robots? When the person who mails you is actually involved/interested, even a greetings-less mail won't sound impersonal. When the person who mails you is not a person, you probably won't get to make it personal. And in the worst case, you may land it right in the uncanny valley.