4 ms·

> coming from a third world country, the promise of a decentralized, permissionless market seems extremely promising > A very basic usage: using Curve.fi to sw

by akarma 5y ago

> coming from a third world country, the promise of a decentralized, permissionless market seems extremely promising > A very basic usage: using Curve.fi to swap between tokenized USD (USDC) and tokenized EURO (EURS) with minimal slippage and fees, all permissionless, all freely accessible. As a sibling comment noted, this is hypothetical usage, and a future 'promise,' not actual usable by or providing value to the average person. I went to curve.fi, and from a first glance, anyone not first-world, techie, and extremely familiar with crypto would be completely bewildered by this. "Select a wallet to connect to this dapp" — what is a wallet and what is a dapp? "Swap using all Curve pools" — what's a Curve pool? "Trade routed through alusd" — what does this even mean? "Base APY" — what? I thought I was exchanging currency, not opening a bank account? "veCRV holder/LP ratio (based on fees): 28.74" — This is where even first-world, college-educated people close the website in confusion.

puranjay 5y ago
Bad UX in early technology is kind of expected, isn't it? I'm sure lots of first-world, college-educated people were equally bewildered by email in 1995.
- akarma 5y ago
  Agreed and it's expected, but the question posed was whether there's actual current instances of crypto helping people in the third-world, or whether it's just a bunch of hypothetical future promises of value.
  - puranjay 5y ago
    Speaking as someone from the third world, absolutely. I just implore anyone here to approach this with an open mind. There's lots of fraud, but that's also leading people to come up with newer, more exciting solutions. Like on-chain insurance (https://nexusmutual.io/ https://nexusmutual.io/) or tranches to compartmentalize risk (https://saffron.finance/ https://saffron.finance/) or creating entirely synthetic assets on-chain (https://synthetix.io/ https://synthetix.io/) It's a weird space where finance and tech and design and culture are coming together, and frankly, it's the most fun I've had in tech in years. Even though I feel that current valuations are grossly overheated, the stuff coming out on a daily basis is just a ton of fun.
    - hilbertseries 5y ago
      What’s the advantage here over mpesa?
    - dmitriid 5y ago
      > Like on-chain insurance Doesn't need blockchain > tranches to compartmentalize risk Doesn't need blockchain > creating entirely synthetic assets on-chain What does it even mean? Also: doesn't require blockchain.
      - puranjay 5y ago
        Blockchain is what makes it freely accessible to anyone from anywhere without requiring a sign up or kyc or local presence. For instance, I can’t sign up for a US trading account without a certain amount of capital, going through a specialized broker, and clearing certain KYC rules. I can do all of that without ever needing to go through a single centralized authority. I can buy a tokenized version of TSLA stock without going through a broker and having complete and 100% control over my capital at all times. Unless you consider financial inclusivity and free and open financial markets a bad thing, of course. All the criticism is so first world centric and elitist
        dmitriid 5y ago
        > Blockchain is what makes it freely accessible to anyone from anywhere without requiring a sign up Except... You need to signup because there's literally no way to obtain anything on blockchain if you're not a miner. Well, you could probably sell something for bitcoin, but then oops, you need to sign up somewhere to convert it into actual real money. > I can’t sign up for a US trading account without a certain amount of capital, going through a specialized broker, and clearing certain KYC rules. And there are reasons for that. And yes, similar crypto set ups quickly rediscover what those reasons are. > I can do all of that without ever needing to go through a single centralized authority. Until you pay for something and that something never arrives. Then you would be very glad to have a central authority. > All the criticism is so first world centric and elitist Ah yes. The tired old "but the poor people in poor countries" cries the person whose first example was "I can’t sign up for a US trading account without a certain amount of capital". Because, as we all know, people not from the first world are flocking to open up US trading accounts and buy TSLA stocks.

by akarma 5y ago

puranjay 5y ago

Bad UX in early technology is kind of expected, isn't it? I'm sure lots of first-world, college-educated people were equally bewildered by email in 1995.

akarma 5y ago
Agreed and it's expected, but the question posed was whether there's actual current instances of crypto helping people in the third-world, or whether it's just a bunch of hypothetical future promises of value.
- puranjay 5y ago
  Speaking as someone from the third world, absolutely. I just implore anyone here to approach this with an open mind. There's lots of fraud, but that's also leading people to come up with newer, more exciting solutions. Like on-chain insurance (https://nexusmutual.io/ https://nexusmutual.io/) or tranches to compartmentalize risk (https://saffron.finance/ https://saffron.finance/) or creating entirely synthetic assets on-chain (https://synthetix.io/ https://synthetix.io/) It's a weird space where finance and tech and design and culture are coming together, and frankly, it's the most fun I've had in tech in years. Even though I feel that current valuations are grossly overheated, the stuff coming out on a daily basis is just a ton of fun.
  - hilbertseries 5y ago
    What’s the advantage here over mpesa?
  - dmitriid 5y ago
    > Like on-chain insurance Doesn't need blockchain > tranches to compartmentalize risk Doesn't need blockchain > creating entirely synthetic assets on-chain What does it even mean? Also: doesn't require blockchain.
    - puranjay 5y ago
      Blockchain is what makes it freely accessible to anyone from anywhere without requiring a sign up or kyc or local presence. For instance, I can’t sign up for a US trading account without a certain amount of capital, going through a specialized broker, and clearing certain KYC rules. I can do all of that without ever needing to go through a single centralized authority. I can buy a tokenized version of TSLA stock without going through a broker and having complete and 100% control over my capital at all times. Unless you consider financial inclusivity and free and open financial markets a bad thing, of course. All the criticism is so first world centric and elitist
      - dmitriid 5y ago
        > Blockchain is what makes it freely accessible to anyone from anywhere without requiring a sign up Except... You need to signup because there's literally no way to obtain anything on blockchain if you're not a miner. Well, you could probably sell something for bitcoin, but then oops, you need to sign up somewhere to convert it into actual real money. > I can’t sign up for a US trading account without a certain amount of capital, going through a specialized broker, and clearing certain KYC rules. And there are reasons for that. And yes, similar crypto set ups quickly rediscover what those reasons are. > I can do all of that without ever needing to go through a single centralized authority. Until you pay for something and that something never arrives. Then you would be very glad to have a central authority. > All the criticism is so first world centric and elitist Ah yes. The tired old "but the poor people in poor countries" cries the person whose first example was "I can’t sign up for a US trading account without a certain amount of capital". Because, as we all know, people not from the first world are flocking to open up US trading accounts and buy TSLA stocks.