3 ms·
"honestly want to know what changed so suddenly such that it's now okay to discuss the lab leak hypothesis in polite company." - first guess is someone no long
by stevenicr 5y ago
"honestly want to know what changed so suddenly such that it's now okay to discuss the lab leak hypothesis in polite company."
- first guess is someone no longer in office that could of benefited politically from that possible truth, ahem rhetoric, err.. conspiracy - no what do we call it now?
- stevenicr 5y agoSo it seems some others are seeing it this way too - Krystal and Saagar: New Evidence Emerges For Lab Leak Hypothesis As Fauci Does Total 180 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZniDsuCX5g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZniDsuCX5g And if you consider this is part of the cost for the walls against Trump to 'save democracy'( https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/ https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/ ) - some think it's a small price to pay I guess. I never understood how media just couldn't come out and say "odds of lab creation are 1 in 500 billion, so it's more likely trump is wrong - instead it was all a solid - debunked - wrong, racist, not a chance, yada yada." Seeing the time piece I guess it makes more sense. I wonder how many memes copy pasta to how many people to influence with this not-half-truth.
- stevenicr 5y agoA deeper (wider maybe) dive into this issue with more info: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DeuwqHDIRSQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DeuwqHDIRSQ Media’s Lab-Leak Failure Is [like ramifications from] Next Iraq WMD from the Hill / Rising with Krystal and Saagar [brackets words added by me, not in original title, also uncapped some words]