3 ms·
> Declaring my comment flamebait is telling. It's a completely banal observation about a conflict in someone's position. The many angry personal attacks (such a
by eganist 5y ago
> Declaring my comment flamebait is telling. It's a completely banal observation about a conflict in someone's position. The many angry personal attacks (such as yours) are not my doing, and reflect on your own rather bizarre motivations.
Hm... I applied the label to the original comment I replied to, not yours.
But defaultname, I do see you're pretty new. Try not to take things personally; even me labeling their comment as flamebait is a description of the comment and style of discourse rather than an assertion about the person.
The goal in the end is to have quality discussion where we can all learn something and grow a bit, and none of that happens if we either attack each other or perceive each others' words as attacks.
For what it's worth, I do apologize if my words rubbed you the wrong way. Certainly wasn't my intent.
- foldr 5y agoDefaultname’s original comment isn’t flamebait. It just expresses a fairly mild opinion about the direction that Rossman’s channel has taken. It’s especially ironic that you should be so concerned about assuming the best intentions. When has Rossman ever done that in the case of Apple?! Like defaultname, I also think that Rossman has done a lot of good, but that doesn’t mean that everyone has to love his YouTube channel or refrain from saying anything critical about it.