3 ms·
I am well aware of these, of course, and they have not been tested at the supreme court where they would fail. You'll note that one of the numbers in question[
by rsync 5y ago
I am well aware of these, of course, and they have not been tested at the supreme court where they would fail.
You'll note that one of the numbers in question[1] is published, in full, on the wikipedia page that you link to.
[1] 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
- ASalazarMX 5y agoThat one was everywhere at the time, it's still a trade secret, but utterly unenforceable. As you say, it's one number, Wikipedia is not publishing all of them for a reason.
- karmicthreat 5y agoI think you are making a pretty big assumption that it would fail in the supreme court. It's not like the supreme court has abolished asset forfeiture either.