3 ms·
>In the United States I can write, or say, any number I choose to. Nope, you can't: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
by ASalazarMX 5y ago
>In the United States I can write, or say, any number I choose to.
Nope, you can't: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number
Edit: About an unhosted wallet being a clear case of freedom of speech because it can be encoded as text; even if it was, what are you expressing? The intent to evade cryptotaxes?
- rsync 5y agoI am well aware of these, of course, and they have not been tested at the supreme court where they would fail. You'll note that one of the numbers in question[1] is published, in full, on the wikipedia page that you link to. [1] 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
- ASalazarMX 5y agoThat one was everywhere at the time, it's still a trade secret, but utterly unenforceable. As you say, it's one number, Wikipedia is not publishing all of them for a reason.
- karmicthreat 5y agoI think you are making a pretty big assumption that it would fail in the supreme court. It's not like the supreme court has abolished asset forfeiture either.