EDIT: Short summary (half-subjective) = "More ergonomic + flexible higher-level-syntax C++ that performs just as well." -------- I'm a programming language en

EDIT: Short summary (half-subjective) = "More ergonomic + flexible higher-level-syntax C++ that performs just as well." -------- I'm a programming language enthusiast and enjoy learning + experimenting with them in my free time. I've written code in most things, especially newer or niche languages. (Always interesting to try them out and get new perspectives) Anyways, I've quickly grown attached to D, even in comparison to say Rust or Nim, and I could maybe speak to some of those points: - C/C++ interop: One of only a handful of languages that can do direct C++ interop without a wrapper (others being Ada, Nim, and experimentally Swift). But it has the most ERGONOMIC interop with C/C++ of any language because of how syntactically similar it is. - Syntax: If someone were to tell me there was a language that felt like you were writing some kind of very high level Javascript/Typescript/Kotlin/C/C++ mixture, but you still had as much low-level power and access as C++, I would have assumed the language was a joke. That's kind of what D is like -- it's not a joke though! - Language constructs: D really hit the nail on the head in my mind here. It has scope guards ("scope(exit)", etc, for methods) void main() { writeln("<html>"); scope(exit) writeln("</html>"); // ... } Compile-time function execution, and a metaprogramming/reflection system that blows away most high-level languages I've worked with. Here's a compile-time generic template that can be added to a struct/class to mix in function pointer definitions from another module or struct/class with reflection: mixin template InjectFunctionPointers(T) { static foreach (fptr; __traits(allMembers, T)) { static if (isFunctionPointer!(__traits(getMember, T, fptr))) { mixin(typeof(__traits(getMember, T, fptr)).stringof, " ", fptr, ";"); } } } struct MyStruct { // Compile-time embedded into the struct with reflection InjectFunctionPointers!(module.with.function.pointers); } And I'm not sure what the exact term for this is, but it's the equivalent of Rust's "where: T" constraints for methods and C++'s concepts (sort of). This shows generics/templates, variadic template arguments, and the concept I just mentioned: auto cartesianProduct(R1, R2, RR...) ( R1 range1, R2 range2, RR otherRanges ) if (!allSatisfy!(isForwardRange, R1, R2, RR) || anySatisfy!(isInfinite, R1, R2, RR)); And it has Design-by-Contract long square_root(long x) in { assert(x >= 0); } out (result) { assert((result * result) <= x && (result+1) * (result+1) > x); } do { return cast(long)std.math.sqrt(cast(real)x); } D has "no-GC" modes and manually memory management if you want. You can just add "@nogc" above a function (or an entire module/program) and it'll disable the garbage collector. There's also "-betterC" for a stripped down, non-memory managed, C-like version of D without the stdlib. // Disable the garbage collector for the method // Or, put @nogc: at the top of a module/program to disable it for the entire thing @nogc void main() { // stuff } There's also a somewhat newer Rust-like ownership + borrow-checker system in D, with @live. https://dlang.org/blog/2019/07/15/ownership-and-borrowing-in-d/ https://dlang.org/blog/2019/07/15/ownership-and-borrowing-in... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20441519 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20441519 Last but not least, the community is small but active and close-knit + welcoming. ------------------- That being said: - D has a much smaller ecosystem of tooling and libs than Rust/C++ - Similarly the development experience isn't quite on par. It's not bad though, quite usable, particularly on VS Code (the Visual Studio extension is also solid).