> your 50/50 split of n is the most aggressive way to interpret that information. I'm satisfied with that choice. Given that Google are here quoting this stat

> your 50/50 split of n is the most aggressive way to interpret that information. I'm satisfied with that choice. Given that Google are here quoting this stat in the press (with the 50/50 implication) to defend themselves against an inequality suit, without actually giving us the figures, I assume that this is the best spin that Google can put on it.