4 ms·
You’re assuming things he didn’t say. He didn’t investigate that in depth. All we saw is the hosted images. Which is wrong, but most likely a mistake done by th
by slver 5y ago
You’re assuming things he didn’t say. He didn’t investigate that in depth. All we saw is the hosted images. Which is wrong, but most likely a mistake done by the devs charged with copying him.
- mynameisvlad 5y agoAnd you’re being incredibly charitable to Retool, who haven’t even said their side of the story. Those URLs don’t create themselves. It looks to be using a hash of some sort, which means it needs to be something generating them, it’s not just them appending a hash to https://fakercloud.com https://fakercloud.com. And even if it were, why use fakercloud, a paid service that you don’t subscribe to, and not your own? In either case, your original complaint is that the author can’t decide between working for free or paid. It’s clear that isn’t the case considering, as I pointed out, they have a cloud service that’s paid. They clearly have figured out some way to be paid for their work.
- slver 5y agoNow you’re assuming even more he didn’t say. And I’m not charitable to retool. They’re opportunists. But they were provided with a screaming opportunity here. It’s like getting naked, rubbing some condiments on yourself, going to the woods and screaming EAT ME. Eventually something will start chewing on you, and then you start whining about how unfair life is? Please.