Is it really a challenge if "quality" is a measure of being fit for purpose? You don't necessarily have to compare across every technology if you are able to re

Is it really a challenge if "quality" is a measure of being fit for purpose? You don't necessarily have to compare across every technology if you are able to recognize a great tool that does what you need. "If the definition ends up aligning with what large companies look for when adopting a new technology, then the signal ends up being the same." And even then, the signal is only the same, but it's not worse. Whereas if large companies don't always optimize for quality, but have other incentives at play, or if they are less nimble, or less efficient, then looking for what large companies look for might actually end up setting you back with worse signal. So there's no upside I think.