4 ms·
MSSQL ? As in Microsoft SQL Server? I have heard this argument a lot and all the comparisons I have seen are specific benchmarks on specialized hardware. My own
by harikb 5y ago
MSSQL ? As in Microsoft SQL Server? I have heard this argument a lot and all the comparisons I have seen are specific benchmarks on specialized hardware. My own personal experience wasn’t anything like the benchmarks
- sigzero 5y agoBy "few years" he has to mean 10 to 15 years. ;)
- HideousKojima 5y agoMSSQL still has a few features that set it apart from Postgres. Off the top of my head are Filestream (basically storing files in the database while still having them accessible as files on the filesystem) and temporal tables without the need for extensions. Personally if I were choosing the tech stack for my company I'd still go for Postgres though
- johnthescott 5y agopg has had file fw for years: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/file-fdw.html https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/file-fdw.html