3 ms·
If they barely had 10k in their vault, then it logically follows that they almost never need that much (otherwise they would obviously make it a point to keep m
by burgerbrain 15y ago
If they barely had 10k in their vault, then it logically follows that they almost never need that much (otherwise they would obviously make it a point to keep more). If they rarely need that much, then it logically follows that somewhere at or less than 10k is a reasonable amount to have. There is no sense in taking the increased liability of having more if they don't need to.
Furthermore, acting as a "proper bank" means they do a lot more than just acting as your personal piggy-bank/mattress. If they have all their money tied up in cash, it means they can't actually be preforming real bank activities (investment).
- white_devil 15y agoFair enough. But basically me and a couple of other people on this thread wanted to point out that the banking system is not very sound. I just chimed in with my anecdote.
- burgerbrain 15y agoYour anecdote has more to do with the logistics of running a bank than it does with the soundness of banks though.
- white_devil 15y agoThat may be, but it doesn't affect how sound the banking system is. You think this is enough nitpicking, or do you want to go on?