4 ms·
I would say an innate talent for ‘coding’ is a relatively minor factor. What is very rare to see is people showing the level of responsibility and grit to get o
by jbjbjbjb 5y ago
I would say an innate talent for ‘coding’ is a relatively minor factor. What is very rare to see is people showing the level of responsibility and grit to get on by themselves and build something. Also in a business setting it is unheard of for someone to have the opportunity or even be trusted enough to do it not to mention all the other business factors.
- taneq 5y agoJust like Usain Bolt’s physical attributes are a minor factor and it’s his grit and responsibility that makes him so quick?
- jbjbjbjb 5y agoNo it is completely different the analogy doesn’t work. Coding isn’t running.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- ZephyrBlu 5y ago> I would say an innate talent for ‘coding’ is a relatively minor factor I would argue that innate talent is strongly linked to genetics. In the case of coding, I think intelligence plays a large role.
- jbjbjbjb 5y agoIt plays a role, sure. There will be significant diminishing returns though. What I’m suggesting is there are other factors at play here that are way more important than a few extra IQ points. Completing a significant project isn’t one dimensional.
- Datenstrom 5y ago> innate talent is strongly linked to genetics I do not believe there is much of a spread in intelligence based on genetics. Short of disability, and given the same consistency, training, and opportunities I seriously doubt that anything even remotely close to a 10x gap would be seen. I am certainly not keen on the science of the topic though, biology is certainly my worst subject. But I have heard of no research showing such a divide.