"What is the problem with allowing users to have choice, especially in a gaming context, to find a cheaper option for content?" What's the point in this questi

"What is the problem with allowing users to have choice, especially in a gaming context, to find a cheaper option for content?" What's the point in this question? The answer is clear: that any company wants to limit choice to the extent it helps their business. Shouldn't the judge be more concerned about the specific nature of the legality of it all?