Pulling up the actual paper, there is an added part the article doesn't mention. > Prediction markets, in which experts in the field bet on the replication res

Pulling up the actual paper, there is an added part the article doesn't mention. > Prediction markets, in which experts in the field bet on the replication results before the replication studies, showed that experts could predict well which findings would replicate (11). So it's even stating that this isn't completely innocent, given different incentives most reviewers identify a suspicious study, but under current incentives it seems letting it through due to the novelty is somehow warranted.