Sony/Microsoft/Nintendo get to avoid competition because games aren't important? I don't like that argument. At the end of the day, it's a company telling a co

Sony/Microsoft/Nintendo get to avoid competition because games aren't important? I don't like that argument. At the end of the day, it's a company telling a consumer what they can or can't do with their own property. Sony saying you can't buy a game from anyone else is just anti-competitive BS. It isn't fair to consumers, and it isn't fair to developers. Hopefully the court rules in favor of Epic, and this case is used as precedent to go against the game console monopolies next. Also, for what it's worth, the "real" reason why game consoles aren't allowed to be jailbroken under DMCA rules (whereas phones, computers, and other devices are) is because, currently, most people only want to do it to commit piracy. Of course, that's because there are no other legitimate software vendors for that hardware. It's a chicken and egg problem.