I believe that's a thinly veiled criticism directed at Apple. Even Apple tries to optimize for cost and what I would label aesthetic. You'd have to convince me

I believe that's a thinly veiled criticism directed at Apple. Even Apple tries to optimize for cost and what I would label aesthetic. You'd have to convince me that thinness is worse for the environment than having a repairable product that has the extra packaging and delivery wastage of something that is 2x the bulk and weight so that we can make it last a few more years potentially. Again, this isn't a binary problem. Even if we had an "eco-friendly" computer, it doesn't teleport to its destination. Your argument is equivalent to banning all cars because human death is unacceptable. Cars give more than they take, that's why we tolerate the death statistics.