3 ms·

What are you talking about? Do you believe that impoverished neighborhoods which are underserved by grocery stores ("food deserts", a real phenomenon) drove the

What are you talking about? Do you believe that impoverished neighborhoods which are underserved by grocery stores ("food deserts", a real phenomenon) drove them away because residents shoplifted from them too much, or something?

benjohnson 5y ago
It's happening here where I live - we have a locally owned grocery store has had to reduce hours, post a guard, and now is considering closing because of rampant shoplifting.
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
mynameishere 5y ago
Partly. It's also a lack of demand for decent food. It's not like Krogers (etc) is part of some conspiracy to not sell produce to poor people. That's what the media seems to think, but I don't think so.
- wyclif 5y ago
  This is correct. Not only are grocery store profit margins razor thin in a general sense, they're thinnest for packaged food found on the shelves in the middle of the store. The biggest margins are in seafood, meat counter, bakery, and produce—the ones more privileged people frequent more often, and poor people less. If the store is in a zip code where poverty is rampant, packaged, canned, and boxed food starts looking a lot like a cost center from a business perspective. This isn't directly related to shoplifting and theft since the high priced items are usually behind the counter, but if you are a grocery chain with hundreds of stores the poorly performing ones are always going to be closed first. And those are almost always in urban, crime-ridden areas. [Source: worked as a supermarket cashier as a teenager.]
CincinnatiMan 5y ago
Not sure if you were being sarcastic, but as someone with friends in the corporate side of a large grocery chain (guess which one from my username), this is absolutely a reason food deserts exist. The finances for them just don’t work.
otterley 5y ago
In Emeryville (across the Bay Bridge from San Francisco), there is a Pak N Save supermarket that underwent a significant remodeling/rearrangement a couple of years ago. One of the major changes was that all the alcohol, cosmetics, and personal hygiene supplies were moved to a separate section of the store with a supervised "choke point" through which customers had to enter/exit. I asked the management why they did this, because it was chronically understaffed, and required customers effectively check out twice if they were buying items from this section and the rest of the grocery store. Their response was that it was the only practical option to keep the store open, because otherwise, the amount of shoplifting taking place was going to render the location unprofitable. So yes, this is a very real possibility.
xenihn 5y ago
I can't tell if you're joking or just trolling. What do you think drove them away?
- 01100011 5y ago
  Why, institutional racism of course. You see, the guy with the monocle on the Monopoly box kicked his feet up on the boardroom table and decided that people of color shouldn't be allowed to eat vegetables.

benjohnson 5y ago

It's happening here where I live - we have a locally owned grocery store has had to reduce hours, post a guard, and now is considering closing because of rampant shoplifting.

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]

mynameishere 5y ago

Partly. It's also a lack of demand for decent food. It's not like Krogers (etc) is part of some conspiracy to not sell produce to poor people. That's what the media seems to think, but I don't think so.

wyclif 5y ago
This is correct. Not only are grocery store profit margins razor thin in a general sense, they're thinnest for packaged food found on the shelves in the middle of the store. The biggest margins are in seafood, meat counter, bakery, and produce—the ones more privileged people frequent more often, and poor people less. If the store is in a zip code where poverty is rampant, packaged, canned, and boxed food starts looking a lot like a cost center from a business perspective. This isn't directly related to shoplifting and theft since the high priced items are usually behind the counter, but if you are a grocery chain with hundreds of stores the poorly performing ones are always going to be closed first. And those are almost always in urban, crime-ridden areas. [Source: worked as a supermarket cashier as a teenager.]

CincinnatiMan 5y ago

Not sure if you were being sarcastic, but as someone with friends in the corporate side of a large grocery chain (guess which one from my username), this is absolutely a reason food deserts exist. The finances for them just don’t work.

otterley 5y ago

In Emeryville (across the Bay Bridge from San Francisco), there is a Pak N Save supermarket that underwent a significant remodeling/rearrangement a couple of years ago. One of the major changes was that all the alcohol, cosmetics, and personal hygiene supplies were moved to a separate section of the store with a supervised "choke point" through which customers had to enter/exit. I asked the management why they did this, because it was chronically understaffed, and required customers effectively check out twice if they were buying items from this section and the rest of the grocery store. Their response was that it was the only practical option to keep the store open, because otherwise, the amount of shoplifting taking place was going to render the location unprofitable. So yes, this is a very real possibility.

xenihn 5y ago

I can't tell if you're joking or just trolling. What do you think drove them away?

01100011 5y ago
Why, institutional racism of course. You see, the guy with the monocle on the Monopoly box kicked his feet up on the boardroom table and decided that people of color shouldn't be allowed to eat vegetables.