3 ms·
The ideas in the paper were novel, perhaps (didn't check) but there was far more to learn from looking at reviews where bugs did slip by than doing their experi
by ludamad 5y ago
The ideas in the paper were novel, perhaps (didn't check) but there was far more to learn from looking at reviews where bugs did slip by than doing their experiment. You could probably calculate the bug acceptance rate by category of bug, making a few random data points does not help science here
- foolmeonce 5y agoI think the prevailing belief, and belief they must have had to try their research was the belief that a good percentage of attempts would slip through initial review to be caught at a later stage. I fail to see what your alternative research would do to that apparently false belief other than reinforce it.