3 ms·
Considering some states have already removed this immunity and others are considering it, I don't think it is required. That is to say that the state can and do
by eikenberry 5y ago
Considering some states have already removed this immunity and others are considering it, I don't think it is required. That is to say that the state can and does bring charges for violations done while performing work for the state.
- tisFine 5y agoThat’s fair. I should say instead the historical basis for such protections is rooted in logic similar to what I wrote.