> assumption that every single contributor is honest. There is no such assumption and it has been well known for a long time that such an assumption would be h

> assumption that every single contributor is honest. There is no such assumption and it has been well known for a long time that such an assumption would be harmful. > if all it takes is a couple grad students and an assistant prof to get them in There were 0 malicious commits that made it through the review process (since the paper was incompetent as well as unethical.) You seem to be missing some basic facts here. Filling in those gap would help you partipate more productively in the conversation.