4 ms·

That implies christel was the only staff with access to DNS until now and was hiding that fact, since the domain's been registered to Freenode Limited since at

by mkishi 5y ago

That implies christel was the only staff with access to DNS until now and was hiding that fact, since the domain's been registered to Freenode Limited since at least 2018 and they'd have noticed the change had they been accessing it. I've been reading more into it and it seems that wasn't the case [1], but that just leaves me with more questions. [1]: https://gist.github.com/realrasengan/f569c5e4727d21eb939fff99cb9dc84c https://gist.github.com/realrasengan/f569c5e4727d21eb939fff9...

Macha 5y ago
Understanding that: (a) Freenode ltd had access to the domain (b) Freenode ltd should have access to the domain (c) Freenode ltd is the rightful owner of the domain are three very different matters. How often do you whois your employer's domain? Otherwise, if you've just been appointed leader of an operational staff and believe your organisation owns everything involved, it doesn't seem unreasonable to start introducing basic infosec practices around limiting access (or if it was caused by mandating security measures like 2fa, as mentioned elsewhere in thread)
- mkishi 5y ago
  Not often, but maybe when its parent company goes through a merger and the head of staff makes a public announcement saying "the freenode project will continue being part of and having access to support from the Imperial Family Companies (formerly London Trust Media Holdings (LTMH))." [1] Since I believe freenode to be completely community-owned apart from some holding company that's supposed to host a conference, at that point I might check our WHOIS records and maybe our own policies [2] and question who I'm actually volunteering for. [1]: https://freenode.net/news/freenode-pia-changes https://freenode.net/news/freenode-pia-changes [2]: https://web.archive.org/web/20180606130945/https://freenode.net/policies https://web.archive.org/web/20180606130945/https://freenode....

by mkishi 5y ago

Macha 5y ago

Understanding that: (a) Freenode ltd had access to the domain (b) Freenode ltd should have access to the domain (c) Freenode ltd is the rightful owner of the domain are three very different matters. How often do you whois your employer's domain? Otherwise, if you've just been appointed leader of an operational staff and believe your organisation owns everything involved, it doesn't seem unreasonable to start introducing basic infosec practices around limiting access (or if it was caused by mandating security measures like 2fa, as mentioned elsewhere in thread)

mkishi 5y ago
Not often, but maybe when its parent company goes through a merger and the head of staff makes a public announcement saying "the freenode project will continue being part of and having access to support from the Imperial Family Companies (formerly London Trust Media Holdings (LTMH))." [1] Since I believe freenode to be completely community-owned apart from some holding company that's supposed to host a conference, at that point I might check our WHOIS records and maybe our own policies [2] and question who I'm actually volunteering for. [1]: https://freenode.net/news/freenode-pia-changes https://freenode.net/news/freenode-pia-changes [2]: https://web.archive.org/web/20180606130945/https://freenode.net/policies https://web.archive.org/web/20180606130945/https://freenode....